Tsarnaev Update & Civil Liberties

            Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, admitted to his role in the Boston bombings just over a week ago.  Upon being read his Miranda Rights, he has remained silent.  This raises the question as to whether or not Tsarnaev should have been labelled enemy combatent–which opens the can of worms.   Is the USA technically a warzone in the War on Terror?  With the NDAA, how much strength does the Bill of Rights still have in protecting citizens?  Considering The USA Patriot Act and Martial Law in Boston, how much privacy remains in America?

FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailGoogle+Share
Continue Reading

Cafe Hayek: TANSTAAFLOA

            by DON BOUDREAUX             Here�s a letter to a reader who describes herself as a high-school teacher in Iowa:                 Dear Ms. __________:             You object to my favorable mention, on my blog, of Richard Epstein's criticism of mandated paid sick leave.  The crux of your objection is that Epstein �ignores the likelihood for businesses to pay for the expenses of [paid sick leave] from their profits.�  You concede that businesses might respond as Epstein argues, but regard such a response as �not likely� because �businesses need workers.�             With respect, I believe that the possibility that you regard as a �likelihood� is …

Continue Reading

FEE: Professionally Clever (I Don�t Want Your Waiter�s Money)

            by ANDREW HEATON             You may be alarmed to discover that sequestration affects not only sequestration leads to the involuntary fiscal liposuction of our federal budget, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) will tighten its belt by $7.3 million. That reduction will leave the NEA with an anemic $139.7 million to distribute grants among creative people like me who, apparently, are unable to persuade people to pay them for their services.             Public funding of the arts is contentious. You may recall that in the last presidential election Mitt Romney caught a lot of flak when he told Jim Lehrer that he …

Continue Reading

Cafe Hayek: Maximum Illogic

            by DON BOUDREAUX             Here�s a letter to the Wall Street Journal:             Ralph Nader suggests that the only argument that minimum-wage opponents muster against that policy is that it harms small businesses (�America�s Miserly Minimum Wage Needs an Upgrade,� April 16).  He�s wrong.  Overwhelmingly, the chief argument against the minimum wage is that it reduces low-skilled workers� employment opportunities.  Mr. Nader�s ignorance of the contours of this policy debate alone disqualifies him to comment on the matter.               But to support his case for raising the minimum wage by 47 percent Mr. Nader also serves up several …

Continue Reading