Taxes Always Change Behavior

What would you do if you had a bigger budget? Maybe you really would have taken that vacation, upgraded your running shoes, or bought steak instead of ground beef if you’d had room in your budget to do it. But if you don’t, well, those options are removed. Individuals are constrained by the limits of their resources, full stop. Taxation tightens those constraints even further. As we mentioned in our last post, every tax changes behavior. When you tax something, you get less of it. Tax income, and people work less or find ways to shield their earnings. Tax investments, …

Share
Continue Reading

Daniela Amodei on Self-Awareness: The Leadership Skill Nobody Teaches

Every entrepreneur hits the same wall eventually: you realize you can’t be good at everything. You’re brilliant at product vision but terrible at operations. Or you’re a natural salesperson who freezes when looking at spreadsheets. The instinct is to fix your weaknesses, to become the complete founder who can do it all. Daniela Amodei, co-founder and president of Anthropic, spent 15 years learning the opposite lesson. In her conversation at Stanford’s Entrepreneurial Thought Leaders series, which you can watch below, she makes a case that most business advice ignores: knowing what you’re bad at matters more than trying to fix …

Share
Continue Reading

Taxes & Capitalism: The Necessary Compromise?

You know the rules. Death and taxes—the two certainties of life, as the saying goes. Benjamin Franklin supposedly said it first, though the idea is older than that. And there’s a certain amount of truth in it. Taxes are everywhere. Here in the United States, we have taxes on income, taxes on spending, taxes on businesses, taxes on property. If we invest our money and it makes a return, that gets taxed, too. Certain items get taxed at higher rates than others. There are taxes on imports. And if we’ve managed to accrue a bit of property and savings to …

Share
Continue Reading

Capitalism Means Nobody Does Everything Themselves

Think about the last person you hired to do something you could have figured out on your own. Maybe a plumber. An accountant. Someone to handle your social media. At some point, you sat down, weighed how long it would take you to learn the thing, how long it would take you to do the thing, and how much it would cost you to just have someone who already knows what they’re doing handle it. And you hired them. Or maybe it wasn’t even that formalized. You simply understood that a certain task wasn’t worth your time to do yourself, …

Share
Continue Reading

Advait Sarkar on Why Smarter AI Might Be Making You a Worse Thinker

You’ve probably noticed how easy it is to let AI handle the tedious tasks on your to-do list, from summarizing your emails and drafting your reports to analyzing your data. It feels like a productivity win. But Microsoft researcher Advait Sarkar has a provocative take on what that efficiency is actually costing you. Sarkar’s work at Microsoft Research focuses on how AI tools affect the way we think, and his findings should give every entrepreneur pause. When we offload cognitive work to AI, we might be saving time, but we’re losing practice. Research shows that people using AI assistants produce …

Share
Continue Reading

How Global Trade Makes Everyone Richer

For most of human history, if you wanted something from far away, you had two options: Go find it yourself or take it from someone else who already did. Conquest was the preferred method. Armies marched, ships sailed, empires expanded, and people died—all because someone somewhere wanted resources they didn’t have at home. But over time, we figured out that you don’t actually need to conquer your neighbors to get what they have. You can just trade with them instead. It’s simpler, it’s easier, and it’s a lot less expensive. This shift from conquest to commerce represents one of the …

Share
Continue Reading

Creative Destruction: Why the Old Makes Way for the New

Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter had a gift for memorable phrases. When he described capitalism’s relentless cycle of renewal as “creative destruction,” he captured something profound in just two words that initially seem to contradict each other. But there’s no contradiction. The term brilliantly encompasses both sides of innovation’s equation: the creation of something new and the destruction—or disruption, as we tend to say now—of what came before. And crucially, the order matters. Creation comes first. Destruction follows only when something better emerges to replace it. In our last post, we explored why innovation faces opposition and how it generates wealth …

Share
Continue Reading

Adam Guild on Why Your Team Is Your Entire Business

Like every entrepreneur, you’ve heard “hire the right people” a thousand times. But when Adam Guild, founder of Owner.com, talks about team building, he’s describing a fundamental shift in how business owners should see themselves. Guild started Owner.com at 17, bootstrapping a restaurant marketing platform that survived COVID-19 by pivoting to online ordering in weeks. That scrappy survival mentality served him well early on, but it nearly became his limitation. Like many first-time entrepreneurs, he saw himself as the hero with employees as helpful sidekicks executing his vision. Then he encountered a quote from legendary investor Vinod Khosla that changed …

Share
Continue Reading

Why Innovation Always Faces Opposition

“This time, it’s different.” You’ve probably heard some version of this lately. AI is going to eliminate jobs. Automation will make human workers obsolete. Unlike all those previous technological shifts, this one will actually leave people with nowhere to go. Except people have been saying “this time, it’s different” for centuries. And they’ve always been wrong. The Roman historian Pliny the Elder tells a remarkable story. A glassmaker came before Emperor Augustus with an invention—flexible glass that could be hammered back into shape after being dented or dropped. He demonstrated this “vitrum flexile” by throwing it on the floor before …

Share
Continue Reading

How Moral Hazard Inflated the 2008 Housing Bubble

In our last post, we explored how the 2008 financial crisis happened because policymakers thought they could manage the economy like a machine—setting interest rates, guiding lending, engineering outcomes. They couldn’t. The knowledge problem meant they were making decisions based on information they simply didn’t have and couldn’t have. But there’s another piece to this puzzle, one that’s just as important for understanding what went wrong: moral hazard. The term sounds technical, but the concept is straightforward. Moral hazard happens when someone gets to make decisions but doesn’t have to live with the full consequences of those decisions. When the …

Share
Continue Reading